Ryan Dickerson vs Dante Pagani Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Oct at 05:34 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Dickerson vs D. Pagani

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Dickerson 1 - 0 Pagani
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ryan Dickerson winning 2 and Dante Pagani winning 0. The last match between Ryan Dickerson and Dante Pagani was at the M15 Santiago, 17-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Ryan Dickerson getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Dickerson | 1 |
Pagani | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Santiago(10-17-25)
R. Dickerson vs D. Pagani H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
59.22% (106-73) | Career Total W/L | 53.33% (8-7) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Dickerson vs D. Pagani Match Preview:
- Second serve success in recent matches shows Ryan Dickerson slightly ahead, winning 42.94% compared to Dante Pagani's 41.53%.
- Who displays an advantage in return games? Ryan Dickerson wins 51.51% of opponent's second serves, superior to Dante Pagani's 44.80%.
- On first serve returns, Dante Pagani edges out Ryan Dickerson with 33.33% over 27.27%.
- When under pressure, Dante Pagani saves 54.35% of breakpoints, narrowly outperforming Ryan Dickerson who saves 53.33%.
- Both players share a similar match win rate of 61.54% over the past year, highlighting their evenly matched capabilities.
- Dante Pagani shows his best form on clay, as does Ryan Dickerson, each securing a 57% win rate on the surface.
- In Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, Dante Pagani wins 72.73% of matches versus Ryan Dickerson's 62.00%.
- Analyzing opponent quality, Ryan Dickerson competes against higher-ranked players (average rank 295) compared to Dante Pagani's 336.08.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Pagani is likely favored, having won 75% of such sets versus Dickerson's 28%.
Editorial Prediction (October 17, 2025, UTC):
As we review the head-to-head statistics and recent form, a competitive edge emerges between Dante Pagani and Ryan Dickerson. Both players exhibit noteworthy strengths and similar winning percentages over the past year.
In terms of serve performance, Dickerson holds a slight advantage on second serves, which may contribute to key points during their match. However, Pagani excels in returning first serves, suggesting sharper responses in critical moments.
A noteworthy factor is their performance under pressure; Pagani marginally outperforms Dickerson in saving breakpoints. In deciding sets, Pagani's dominance is evident, with a significantly higher win percentage, indicating mental fortitude and resilience.
Considering the surface preference and tournament level achievements, both play equally well on clay, but Pagani's superior performance in crucial moments, coupled with his prowess in the final set, gives him the upper hand.
Thus, based on current statistics and trends, Dante Pagani is more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming match.
Ryan Dickerson vs Dante Pagani Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Dickerson vs D. Pagani H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 5 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:25:37 | Average Match Time | 1:25:37 |
73% (32/44) | 1st Serve % | 47% (22/47) |
88% (28/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (14/22) |
67% (8/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (11/25) |
60% (3/5) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
47% (22/47) | Return Points Win % | 18% (8/44) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Dickerson Recent Matches Played
D. Pagani Recent Matches Played

R. Dickerson vs D. Pagani Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59.22% (106/73) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.33% (8/7) |
59.57% (249/169) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.43% (18/17) |
54.39% (2120/1778) | Games Win/Loss | 48.68% (166/175) |
58.42% (59/42) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
62.67% (47/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.33% (8/7) |
0.00% (0/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
171 | Aces Total | 11 |
0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
474 | Total Double Faults | 23 |
1:8:17 | Average Match Time | 1:38:10 |
307.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 346.8 |
63% (4165/6587) | 1st Serve % | 63% (514/812) |
66% (2745/4165) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (317/514) |
44% (1071/2422) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (140/298) |
47% (309/662) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (41/112) |
41% (2667/6495) | Return Points Win % | 43% (380/878) |
50.00% (1/1) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
59.32% (105/72) | Futures W/L | 61.54% (8/5) |
59% (106/179) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (8/15) |
53% (19/36) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
38% (23/60) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (3/5) |
79% (121/95) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (6/5) |
21% (121/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (6/1) |
19% (58/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (9/3) |